US Senate Archives - CasinoBeats http://casinobeats.com/tag/us-senate/ The pulse of the global gaming industry Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:09:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 https://casinobeats.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/cropped-favicon-32x32.png US Senate Archives - CasinoBeats http://casinobeats.com/tag/us-senate/ 32 32 House Passes Big Beautiful Bill Without Changes; Gambling Deduction Cap Set to Become Law http://casinobeats.com/2025/07/04/big-beautiful-bill-gambling-deduction-cap-2026/ Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:09:04 +0000 https://casinobeats.com/?p=150350 The US House has passed the Senate’s version of the “Big Beautiful Bill Act” without amendments, cementing a controversial change to how gambling losses are treated for tax purposes. The small provision changes the tax deduction cap from 100% of gambling losses up to the winnings down to 90%. While a small change on the […]

The post House Passes Big Beautiful Bill Without Changes; Gambling Deduction Cap Set to Become Law appeared first on CasinoBeats.

]]>
The US House has passed the Senate’s version of the “Big Beautiful Bill Act” without amendments, cementing a controversial change to how gambling losses are treated for tax purposes.

The small provision changes the tax deduction cap from 100% of gambling losses up to the winnings down to 90%. While a small change on the surface, the change could have significant implications for the gambling industry.

Once President Trump signs the bill, it will go into effect at the beginning of 2026.

What’s The Change?

Under current tax law, gamblers can deduct losses up to the amount of their winnings. Professional gamblers can also deduct related expenses, such as travel and lodging, as long as those and related losses don’t exceed winnings. For example, if an individual wins $100,000 in gambling but then loses the entire amount, they don’t owe anything.

However, the Senate’s amendments to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will limit the deductions to 90% of the gambling losses incurred. As a result, gamblers could now owe taxes even if they don’t make a profit. Significantly, they can owe taxes even if they have substantial net losses.

For example, a gambler wins $100,000 but loses $100,000. Currently, they don’t owe anything, as they can deduct all of their losses, which equal the winnings.

With the upcoming changes, in the same scenario, the gambler can only deduct $90,000 (90% of the $100,000 in losses). That results in $10,000 in taxable income.

As income from gambling is taxed at about 24%, the gambler now owes approximately $2,400 in taxes, despite making no profit.

Nevada Congresswoman Plans Repeal Effort

The day after the Senate passed the bill, US Rep. Dina Titus from Nevada said that she was “working on a legislative fix that fairly treats gaming losses in the tax code.”

As the House passed the bill without changes, Titus told Las Vegas’ Channel 13 that she wanted to offer an amendment. However, House managers refused to accept any.

She added that she plans to bring a bill to repeal the provision next week. However, Titus, a Democrat, faces an uphill battle in a Republican-controlled House.

Titus has also stated that she believes the Joint Tax Committee’s estimates of $1.1 billion in federal revenue over eight years are overstated, with Republicans seeking additional funds from anywhere to mitigate the impact of the bill’s tax cuts.

In addition, she said the provision punishes honest people who do the right thing to report their winnings. The change would drive many to offshore gambling or to lie about their winnings to avoid additional taxation.

Industry Impact: Threat to Professional Gamblers and States

Professional gamblers who stand to lose the most, as well as industry experts, have been quick to criticize the deduction cap.

Professional poker player Phil Galfond said the change “would end professional gambling.” He later clarified that while this may be an overstatement, many professionals would no longer be viable. He warned that both professional and recreational gamblers might turn to offshore platforms to avoid new tax burdens.

Captain Jack Andrews, a professional sports bettor and industry educator, called it “an existential threat” to professional gambling in the US.

Tax expert and poker player Russell Fox echoed these concerns. He noted that many in the industry were unaware of the provision and will work to reverse it.

Beyond professionals, recreational gamblers could also face unexpected tax bills, discouraging legal gambling and reducing participation. Some individuals may opt for offshore platforms to avoid taxation.

While the scale is unknown, gambling establishments and online platforms would likely feel the ripple effect. That’s due to a decrease in wagering volume, especially among high-stakes and frequent bettors, who drive liquidity.

Moreover, state governments may ultimately lose tax revenue as players gamble less or shift to unregulated options.

The post House Passes Big Beautiful Bill Without Changes; Gambling Deduction Cap Set to Become Law appeared first on CasinoBeats.

]]>
US Senate’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” Could Force Gamblers to Pay Taxes Even When They Lose http://casinobeats.com/2025/07/02/senate-bill-gambling-loss-deduction-cap/ Wed, 02 Jul 2025 17:03:36 +0000 https://casinobeats.com/?p=149489 The Senate’s new bill could cap gambling loss deductions at 90%, forcing gamblers to pay taxes even when they lose money.

The post US Senate’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” Could Force Gamblers to Pay Taxes Even When They Lose appeared first on CasinoBeats.

]]>
While President Trump’s sweeping “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” has sparked heated debate over topics such as cuts in Medicaid, a lesser-known provision of the Senate’s version could have a significant impact on recreational and professional gamblers.

Unlike the House version passed in May, the Senate’s bill proposes capping gambling loss deductions at 90% of the annual losses. That’s a sharp departure from the current law, which allows gamblers to deduct 100% of their losses up to the amount of their total winnings.

If enacted, this change could lead to scenarios where individuals owe thousands in taxes despite breaking even or ending the year at a net loss.

New Deduction Cap Explained

Under current tax law, gamblers can deduct losses (and related expenses for professional gamblers) up to the amount of their winnings. That prevents individuals from paying taxes on lost profits, as long as they provide proper records.

The Senate’s version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would limit the deductions to 90% of the gambling losses incurred.

That means, for example, if you win $100,000 but end up losing the entire amount. Currently, you would pay zero tax. However, under the new proposal, you can only deduct $90,000 (90% of your $100,000 in losses), leaving you with $10,000 in taxable income.

That means you owe approximately $2,400 in taxes, even though you did not make a profit.

The Proposal Could Lead To Substantial Losses for Gamblers and Operators

As professional poker player Phil Galfond explains on X, the Senate proposal will hit professional gamblers especially hard, as they typically operate with high volume.

Galford gives an example. If a professional gambler’s total wins for the year are $5.2 million and their total losses are $5 million, they currently pay tax on the $200,000 profit.

However, under the new proposal, they would pay tax on 10% of the $5 million in losses, plus on the $200,000 in net winnings. That amounts to $700,000. Instead of $200,000 in real taxable income, the professional would pay taxes on $700,000 in taxable income.

Galford insists that if this Senate provision passes, many gamblers will opt for offshore, illegal operators.

This would result in lost taxable revenue for the federal government and states. At the same time, those who opt to visit offshore sites won’t be protected by US consumer protection laws or responsible gaming tools.

Experts warn that this change could lead to substantial losses for the gambling industry. That’s because many recreational gamblers could stop gambling or reduce the amount they spend at regulated gambling establishments or online platforms.

The proposal also comes at a time when many states are raising taxes for gambling operators. For example, Illinois recently voted to tax sportsbooks for every bet placed on their platform. That has led to some, including FanDuel, DraftKings, and most recently Fanatics, to add a surcharge to customers.

Current Tax Structure for Gambling

Under US tax law, individuals are required to report all gambling winnings as taxable income. That includes winnings without a W-2G form.

Casinos and other gambling establishments issue W-2G forms for certain gambling winnings. That includes $1,200 or more from slots or bingo, $1,500 or more from keno, and $5,000 or more from poker tournaments.

The federal tax rate for gambling winnings is 24% on large wins. However, individuals must report even small wins that often result in no tax withholding.

Taxpayers can deduct gambling losses to offset the taxes owed. However, losses are deductible up to the total amount of winnings.

For example, you win $10,000 but lose $15,000. You can deduct up to $10,000 of your losses, bringing your taxable income to zero. The other $5,000 in losses are not deductible, and you cannot carry them over to the next tax year.

Also, out-of-pocket expenses, such as transportation, meals, and lodging, are not deductible unless you qualify as a gambling professional. While professional gamblers can add out-of-pocket expenses, these combined with losses cannot exceed total gambling winnings.

It’s also important to know that to claim gambling deductions, you must keep detailed records including:

  • The date and type of gambling activity.
  • The name and address, or location, of the gambling establishment.
  • The names of other persons (if any) present with you at the gambling establishment.
  • The amount won or lost.
  • Supporting documentation (W-2G forms, betting tickets, receipts, statements, etc.)

Bill’s Status in Congress

The Senate passed the bill on July 1 with a 51-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance providing the tie-breaking vote. Three Republican Senators, Maine’s Susan Collins, North Carolina’s Thom Tillis, and Kentucky’s Rand Paul, sided with the Democrats.

The bill now returns to the House for debate and a vote on the Senate’s amendments. That includes the provision for a 90% deduction cap on gambling losses.

It will likely be referred to a conference committee. Lawmakers from both chambers will negotiate the differences between the two versions before sending a final version back for approval.

However, time is running out. President Donald Trump has set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill. Therefore, if the Senate’s provision remains intact, the bill could significantly reshape the tax landscape for gamblers in the US.

The post US Senate’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” Could Force Gamblers to Pay Taxes Even When They Lose appeared first on CasinoBeats.

]]>